(2) THE MIRACLE AND THE LONG LIFE
Up to now we have seen that the prolongation of life is
scientifically possible. But let us suppose that it is
not, that the process of old-age and decrepitude is
quite rigid, that it cannot either now or in the long
run overcome nor alter its conditions or circumstances -
what will this mean? It will mean that the prolongation
of human life - as is the case of Noah, or al-Mahdi -
runs contrary to the natural laws which science
confirmed thanks to modern instruments of
experimentation. Thus this condition becomes a miracle
that has hindered the applicability of a natural law
under a certain circumstances, in order to preserve the
life of a particular individual whose role is to cherish
the Divine message.
Yet this is not the only miracle of its kind, nor is it
remote from a Muslim's faith, which derives from the
Qur'an and the sunnah. Moreover the process of old-age
is no more rigid than is the process of the passage of
heat from a body of higher temperature to another of
lower temperature until both of them become equal. This
had occurred in the case of Ibrahim (peace be upon him)
when the only way to preserve his life was by hindering
that process, when it was said to the fire in which he
was thrown:
We said, "O fire be cool on Ibrahim and keep him
safe." (Qur'an, 21:69)
So, he emerged from it safe and unharmed. There are also
other cases where natural laws were hindered to protect
some of the prophets or Proofs of Allah on earth. When
the sea was split for Musa (Moses), when the Romans were
misled in thinking they had caught 'Isa (Jesus) or when
Muhammad (peace and blessing of Allah be upon him and
his progeny) left his house, while it was surrounded by
the troops of Quraysh who were waiting for hours to
attack him but Allah, the Exalted, hid him from their
eyes while he was walking in their midst. All of these
cases show a hindrance of the laws of nature to protect
an individual, whom the Divine wisdom wished to
preserve. Therefore, why not include here the process of
old-age and decrepitude?
From this we can deduce a general notion, which is that
whenever the preservation of the Prophet's life (the
Proof of Allah on earth) depends on the hindrance of a
natural law, and the prolongation of his life comes to
be necessary for the performance of his task, Divine
care then intervenes by delaying the process so that the
task of that individual can be accomplished. On the
other hand, once the Divine mission of that individual
has been fulfilled he either dies naturally or as a
martyr depending on what is determined by natural laws.
Thus we find ourselves confronted with the present
question in connection with this general notion: How can
the process be obstructed? How can the necessary
correlation that exists between natural phenomena, be
sundered? Does it not contradict science, which
discovered the existence o f that natural law or process
and defined that necessary correlation on experimental
and deductive bases?
The answer is that science has already solved the
problem by giving up the idea of necessity as far as
natural laws are concerned. To clarify this we can say
that science discovers natural laws through systematic
observations and experiments. For example, when the
occurrence of a natural phenomenon is followed another
one, we deduce from this a natural law which is: that
whenever the first phenomenon comes into existence it is
automatically followed by another phenomenon.
However, science does not propose a necessary
correlation between the two phenomena stemming from
their nature, since necessity is an invisible condition
that experimentation and the instruments of scientific
and inductive inquiry cannot demonstrate. Therefore, the
logic of modern science emphasizes that natural law - as
it is defined by science - does not indicate a necessary
correlation, but an uninterrupted connection, between
two phenomena. But when the miracle occurs and separates
one from the other, it does not mean that their
correlation was sundered.
The truth of the matter is that the miracle, in its
religious sense, has become, in the light of modern
scientific logic, more understandable than before, under
the classical view of causal correlation. This old view
assumed that every two phenomena, in which one is
followed automatically by the other must have a
necessary correlation, which means that it is impossible
to separate one from the other. However, this
correlation has been transformed thanks to modern
scientific logic into a law of correlation or of
consecutive succession between two phenomena without the
hypothesis of invisible necessity.
Thereby the miracle becomes an exceptional condition
with regard to this connective succession without
running against a necessity or leading to an
impossibility.
So, in the light of the logical foundation of induction
we agree with the modern point of view which says that
induction does not demonstrate the existence of a
necessary correlation between two phenomena. We find
that it shows that there is a common interpretation for
the consecutive connection between the two. Since this
common interpretation can be formed on the basis of the
assumption of subjective necessity, it can also be
formed on the assumption of a wisdom that made the
Creator of the universe to continuously combine some
particular phenomena with others. The same wisdom
sometimes calls for exception; thus a miracle occurs.
(3) WHY ALL THIS DESIRE TO PROLONG HIS
LIFE
Now we should deal with the second question which is:
Why should Allah, the Exalted, show all. this desire for
this person in particular? Why should the natural laws
be hindered just to prolong his life? Why should the
leadership of the appointed day not be left to a person
born in the future, who will appear then and assume his
expected role?
In other words: What is the use of this long absence and
what is the motive behind it? Indeed many people ask
these questions, yet at the same time none of them is
prepared to accept the Divine answer for them. However
we believe that the twelve Imams form a unique group of
individuals, none of whom could be substituted. But
these people require a social interpretation of the
situation, in the light of tangible realities, for the
great operation of change and the understandable
requirements for the appointed day.
On these bases, we will temporarily disregard the
characteristics that we believe should be fulfilled in
the infallible Imams and ask the following questions:
As far as the expected operation of change, of the
appointed day, is concerned and as far as it is
understandable in the light o f the norms and the
experiences of life, can we consider the prolonged age
of its preserved leader as one of the factors for its
success? And of his ability to lead it in a better way?
We can give an affirmative answer to this question
because of many reasons among which are the following:
First, that the great operation of change requires from
its leader a unique psychological attitude, filled with
a sense of success and a sense of the insignificance of
the mighty existence which he has been prepared to
struggle against and transform into a new civilized
world.
Thus the more the leader's heart is filled with the
triviality of the civilization he is fighting, and the
clearer is his sense that it is no more than a speck of
dust on the long path of human civilization, the more he
is ready from a psychological angle, to oppose, resist
and persevere in his efforts against it until victory is
achieved.
It is clear, therefore, that the scope required from
this psychological attitude ought to be proportionate to
the size of change to be brought about and what needs to
be rooted out of civilization and existence. So,
whenever the opposition is to a mightier existence and a
loftier and deeply rooted civilization, the greater is
the thrust required from this psychological attitude.
Since the message of the appointed day is to change, in
a comprehensive way, a world filled with injustice and
tyranny, it is therefore natural that it is looking for
an individual whose psycho logical attitude is superior
to that whole world; a person whose age exceeds those
who were born in that world and who were brought up in
the shade of its civilization which he is to destroy and
replace with one based on justice and truth.
For whoever is brought up in a deeply-rooted
civilization, that dominates the world with its values
and modes of thinking, would be overwhelmed by it, since
he would have been born while it had been in existence,
and opened his eyes just to see its different aspects,
and would have been brought up under its power and
influence. Unlike that is a person who has deeply
penetrated history, who has come to life long before
that civilization which completes the cycle of the story
of humanity before the appointed day saw the light. He
sees it as little seeds, hardly visible, then gradually
growing and taking roots within human societies, waiting
for the right moment to blossom and appear. Then he
witnesses it, as it starts to grow and advance,
sometimes relapsing, sometimes meeting with success,
then when it begins to prosper and become gigantic,
gradually dominating the destinies of the world, such a
man who has lived through all these stages with sagacity
and caution, watching this giant - (against which he has
to struggle) under that long historical perspective
which he has lived in reality, and not just read about
in books of history, such an individual would consider
it as a definite destiny, unlike Jean Jacques Rousseau's
consideration of the monarchy in France, when he was
terrified at the mere imagining of France without a
king, in spite of the fact that he was one of the
heralds, both intellectually and philosophically, of the
evolution of the political situation that existed in
those times. That was because Rousseau lived in the
shade and under the influence of the monarchy.
On the other hand this individual who has thoroughly
penetrated history, would have the dignity and strength
of history and a powerful sense that all that surrounds
him of civilization and existence was born at a certain
time in history, when the way was paved for its
existence, that it would disappear to the extent that
nothing of it would remain as when there was nothing of
it before it came into existence in the distant or near
past, that the historical life spans of any
civilization, however long they may be, are only limited
days in the long era of history.
Have you not read the chapter of the cave in the Qur'an
(surah al-Kahf)? Have you not read of those
youths who believed in their Lord, whom Allah increased
in guidance, who opposed a ruling pagan existence that
was ruthless and did not hesitate to suppress every
single seed of at- tawhid (Unity of Allah), so
that it might not rise above the level of idolatory. So
these youths became depressed to the point of despair,
once the windows of hope had been closed before their
eyes; so they sought refuge in the cave, where they
begged Allah for a solution to their problem after
having exhausted all the possibilities. For they could
not tolerate the fact that falsehood was ruling,
transgressing and subjugating the truth and suppressing
anyone whose heart showed an inclination towards the
truth. Do you know what Allah did to them? He made them
sleep for three hundred and nine years in that cave and
caused them to rise up from their long sleep and sent
them to the outside world, after that the existence
which had bewildered them with its power and
transgression had collapsed and became a chapter in
history that could frighten no one nor activate
anything. They were brought out so that they could see
all this with their own eyes and learn that falsehood is
insignificant.
Indeed if this clear vision had been true in the case of
the people of the cave, with all that it bore of
psychological loftiness and thrust out of that unique
event which prolonged their age by three hundred years,
then the same event could occur in the case of al- Mahdi,
the Expected Leader, whose extended age would make him
see the giant as a dwarf, the tall tree as a seed and
the hurricane as a breeze.
Add to this that the experience that is granted by the
concomitants of those consecutive civilizations and the
direct confrontation with all their movements and
changes, has a great influence on the intellectual
preparation and the deepening of experience of the
Expected Leader, since it puts him face to face with the
many various practices of others, with all they contain
of weakness and strength, and the different aspects of
their errors and accuracy. And this enables him to
classify the social symptoms with a complete awareness
of their causes and their historical circumstances.
Moreover the preserved operation of change, which is the
task of the Expected Leader, is founded on a particular
message, namely the message of Islam. Therefore, it is
natural that in this case, the required leadership
should be more proximate with the original sources of
Islam, that his personality be fully shaped in an
independent way, free from the influence of that
civilization which is subject to his struggle on the
appointed day, unlike that individual who would have
been born and brought up in its atmosphere, whose
intellect and feelings would have blossomed within its
frame. Quite often such a person cannot free himself
from the effects and residues of that civilization, even
if he were to lead a movement of change against it.
Thus, in order that the preserved leader be not
influenced by the civilization he has been prepared to
transform, it is necessary that his personality should
be fully shaped during a previous stage of civilization,
as near as possible to the universal spirit, and in
terms of the principles of that civilized condition,
which the appointed day is aiming at realizing under his
leadership.
(4) HOW WAS THE PREPARATION OF THE
EXPECTED LEADER ACHIEVED
Now we have reached the third question which is: How
could the preparation of the Expected Leader be
achieved, while we know that he only remained five years
with his father, al-Imam al-'Askari - which is a period
of childhood not sufficient for the maturity of his
personality.
Therefore, under what circumstances has this achievement
taken place?
The answer is:
That al-Mahdi (peace be upon him) was appointed as a
successor to his father, for the leadership of the
Muslims, which means that he was an Imam in the fullest
intellectual and spiritual sense of the word in a very
early age of his noble life.
Moreover, the early Imamate (leadership) is a previous
phenomenon in the case of his forefathers (peace be upon
them all), for example, al-Imam Muhammad son of 'Ali al-Jawad
(peace be upon him). We call it a phenomenon because it
has given in the case of al-Mahdi's forefathers (peace
be upon them), a perceptible and a practical meaning,
which the Muslims have lived and been aware of, in all
their experiences with the Imams, in one way or another.
Therefore, we cannot claim the proof of a clearer and
wider phenomenon than the experience of a whole
community. So, we can clarify the issue in the following
points:
1) The leadership of the Imams of Ahlu'l-bayt
(descendants of the Prophet) has never been one of the
centres of influence and power that are transmitted
through inheritance, from father to son, with the full
support of the ruling regime, as was the case, in the
leadership of Fatimid caliphs and the 'Abbasids; but it
has always won the good will of its wider popular bases,
on the grounds of their intellectual and spiritual
conviction about the worth of the Imamate for the
leadership of Islam.
2) These popular bases have existed since the dawn of
Islam and became wider during the times of the two
Imams, al-Baqir and as-Sadiq (peace be upon them). The
school that these two Imams led within the boundaries of
these bases formed a very wide trend that stretched all
all over the world of Islam, bringing together hundreds
of jurists (fuqaha') theologians (mutakallimun)
and commentators (mufassirun) on the Qur'an and
the learned in the different branches of Islamic and
human sciences that were predominant in those times, to
the extent that al-Hasan son of 'Ali al-Washsha said, "I
went into al-Kufah Mosque and found nine hundred sheikhs
all of them were saying, 'Ja'far son of Muhammad related
to us . . .'"
3) This school and what it represented of popular bases
from Islamic society, had certain conditions which it
believed in and abode by, in the appointment of the Imam
and his suitability for the role because it believed
that an individual cannot be appointed as Imam unless he
is the most learned among the agnostic of his time.
4) That both this school and its popular bases were
ready to give sacrifices, for the sake of their belief
in the Imamate, since the latter was considered, in the
opinion of the concomitant leadership, as a hostile
line, even from an intellectual point of view. This was
the reason that led the authorities to carry out several
campaigns of purging and torture to the extent that many
people were either killed or were put into prisons,
while hundreds of them died in the darkness of the
cells. This meant that those who believed in the Imamate
were ready to pay a lot, and the only instigation they
had was their nearness to Allah.
5) The Imams these bases yielded to were not isolated
from them, only when the authorities prosecuted them or
sent them into exile. This is what we come to know
through the narrators who related to us the events of
each one among the twelve Imams, and on the one hand
from what has been copied from the letters that they
sent to their contemporaries and the trips that they
took, and on the other hand from representatives that
they dispatched to the different corners of the Islamic
world, as well as the frequent visits that the Shi' ahs
used to pay to their Imams in the holy city of Medina,
when they went to the sacred lands for the performance
of the holy rites of hajj.
All of these factors show an uninterrupted interaction
between the Imam and his popular bases, that stretched
over the different parts of the world of Islam, with all
their different classes including the learned as well as
the others.
|